charliesmum (
charliesmum) wrote2006-01-28 03:23 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Okay you people who watch American Idol, I have a question
Why aren't the people allowed to have an accompanist? Why are they expected to sing with no music? That doesn't seem like a fair way to judge someone's singing, really. I'll bet some of the people who are horribly mocked actually sound a bit better if they have music to guide them. Why don't they have music?
Or at least the sound of a shower running in the background, to make them feel comfortable.*
*Because people like to sing in the shower, that's why
Or at least the sound of a shower running in the background, to make them feel comfortable.*
*Because people like to sing in the shower, that's why
no subject
I think the judges/producers choose to make the contestants perform acoustically for the precise reason you've mentioned - if you're singing with music, you can (to a certain degree) hide missed notes, and don't have to be perform 'perfectly'. If you're performing acoustically, it lets the judges see the natural talent of the performers. Like Bo's acoustic performance in the top 3 - without music, he had to hit every note, or the performance would have failed miserably.
(Sorry if this isn't very clear, and forgive any typos please, cannot seee what I've typed because of the rather large cat in front of the moniutyor.)
no subject
Also I LOVE your icon, as a non Firefly/Serenity fan who was forced by friends to go to a midnight screening.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject