Consider vampires...
Jul. 26th, 2005 07:32 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
We got our lovely fast computer back, and it only cost $80 for a new hard drive. So yay and stuff.
Charlie had a great 2nd day with the new minder - she took him to the pool, where he got to play with his best friend. I'm so pleased Charlie is finally having a real summer holiday.
The boyfriend played with Charlie in the pool, and is a lovely young man. Gonna be a teacher.
Anyway, I had a vampire dream last night, probably because I just read a Lauren K. Hamilton book about vampires, but it also occured to me that I dream of vampires when I'm feeling particularly overwhelmed. I think vampires symbolise to me the act of letting go, of having someone else be in control, in charge, and then I don't have to make any decisions. I was wondering if that was part of why they have such a lasting appeal to writers and movie makers and people who like to wear black alot.
It's really odd. Zombies aren't sexy at all. Werewolves, well, Lupin maybe, but over all they are either savage monsters or tragic figures. Ghosts are either scary or vengeful, or both, but never particularly sexy, but Vampires get all the girls. (or boys if you're Anne Rice)I think it does all come back to control, or losing control, which frankly is what sex is about in some ways.
What do you think?
Charlie had a great 2nd day with the new minder - she took him to the pool, where he got to play with his best friend. I'm so pleased Charlie is finally having a real summer holiday.
The boyfriend played with Charlie in the pool, and is a lovely young man. Gonna be a teacher.
Anyway, I had a vampire dream last night, probably because I just read a Lauren K. Hamilton book about vampires, but it also occured to me that I dream of vampires when I'm feeling particularly overwhelmed. I think vampires symbolise to me the act of letting go, of having someone else be in control, in charge, and then I don't have to make any decisions. I was wondering if that was part of why they have such a lasting appeal to writers and movie makers and people who like to wear black alot.
It's really odd. Zombies aren't sexy at all. Werewolves, well, Lupin maybe, but over all they are either savage monsters or tragic figures. Ghosts are either scary or vengeful, or both, but never particularly sexy, but Vampires get all the girls. (or boys if you're Anne Rice)I think it does all come back to control, or losing control, which frankly is what sex is about in some ways.
What do you think?
no subject
on 2005-07-27 12:04 am (UTC)Glad Charlie is finally getting some fun out of his summer - and his sitter, lol. I'm happy she's turned out better than the last one.
no subject
on 2005-07-27 01:04 am (UTC)There were wererats in this book. Not sexy. :)
no subject
on 2005-07-27 02:03 am (UTC)Ooh, and Rafael - the king of the wererats - ends up sounding like very, very sexy goodness after you read more about him in the other books.
no subject
on 2005-07-27 12:17 pm (UTC)It gets slutty down the line, dude. Not much sluething, and a whole hell of a lot of whoring. The last book was a disappointment. Up until that point, I was hooked.
And the wererats kick ass.
Total OT
on 2005-07-27 05:14 pm (UTC)My sister-in-law's step-sister was exactly the same way, and took every opportunity she could to turn the attention to herself - including running away with some guy and marrying him before Nikki's wedding. Some people just have trouble being happy for people. Sad but true.
I hope your sister straightens up, but I think you are right in telling her straight out how you feel, so many brides try to smooth things over, and you don't need to be walking on eggshells from now until your wedding day.
Re: Total OT
on 2005-07-27 09:29 pm (UTC)My day got worse since now my dad is upset, and he didnt need to be told all this today, but, Ms. Drama needed to call him at work and tell him all of it.
You gotta love little sisters.
no subject
on 2005-07-27 12:38 am (UTC)That's an interesting point about vampires.
no subject
on 2005-07-27 12:53 am (UTC)-They always seem to be attacking young, virginal girls
-Being immortal, they always seem to have accumulated a lot of money and status along the way, and therefore seem to be impeccably groomed, have the best of everything, live in mansions, etc.
- There's a sense of control with them. Whereas zombies and werewolves just sort of... lunge at your throat, they always seem to be exceptionally well-mannered, polite, seductive to the point of being hypnotic. They know exactly how to behave to win you over. THEN they lunge at your throat :P
-Less messy. Zombies eat your brains, werewolves savage you, vampires just bite your neck hard enough to draw blood. Kinda kinky ;)
That's all I could come up with, but I know what you mean... there's a weird sort of attraction to them, if in a rather dark, sadomasochistic way.
no subject
on 2005-07-27 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
on 2005-07-27 02:32 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2005-07-27 03:09 pm (UTC)If it's original, I know of a place taking submissions.
no subject
on 2005-07-27 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
on 2005-07-27 03:34 pm (UTC)I'll toss you the link in mail and you can take a look and decide.
no subject
on 2005-07-27 08:10 am (UTC)I think it's because vampires are superhuman, but so strictly bounded; werewolves are very hard to defeat without overwhelming force, but there are a million ways to put off a vampire. They can't come into your home unless you invite them, is the major thing. So, yeah, huge power/control/death metaphors, and the exchange/giving of life thing. It ties in very neatly to sex. But then, it also depends on the writer; most tend to make their vampires sexy, but I've read a few whose vampires are mostly scary-eww monsters. The best example I can think of are the vampires in Robin mcKinley's "Sunshine". While there is some limited sexual attraction (though that's mainly part of working out a friendship) for the most part they are very "other" and almost asexual. As well as scary monsters.
no subject
on 2005-07-27 02:32 pm (UTC)Rape or seduction, I always thought. I mention it in my own vampire story that I wrote, even. :)
no subject
on 2005-07-27 01:57 pm (UTC)That said, I've totally studied the business about why vampires are perceived as being sexy, and I can't remember a lot of the details. Just that vampire fiction, if I'm not mistaken, began with LeFanu and other writers around that era, and in books at that time - at least in American books written by men, which was obviously most of them - women were generally perceived either as perfect household goddesses or as whoreish temptresses. Female sexuality was demonized very literally in the form of vampires.
But I can't remember what's cause and what's effect here. Were women written as vampires because vampires were sexy and dangerous, or did vampires become sexy and dangerous after LeFanu got the ball rolling? You'd have to ask
no subject
on 2005-07-27 02:31 pm (UTC)I don't know who LeFanu is. I need to go look him up. My own vampire fantasies started after seeing Frank Langella in "Dracula '79" based on the play that he also starred in. He was really dead sexy in that. You totally wanted him to win in the end.
no subject
on 2005-07-27 02:52 pm (UTC)I am sure as I think about it that women were written as vampires because vampires were already perceived as sexy but evil and dangerous, rather than the other way around. LeFanu wrote, well, vampire stories - almost exclusively, I believe, and I think he also *slightly* predated Stoker, but - am I remembering any of this correctly at all? - there was a boom in vampire fiction in the Victorian period and slightly before, which is when both of them were writing. Which makes sense, because I think it also coincided with a boom in Gothic fiction? I don't know, I could be making that last part up.
It makes sense on some level that vampires would be perceived as sexy... the threat that they present is, as
Goddammit, now I really do have to ask